Oct. 26th, 2008

theoldwolf: (Default)
Posting this in response to a justified rant by [livejournal.com profile] torakiyoshi on the functional illiteracy of so many students in America.

The complete absence of writing skills has just as much to do with a lack of global Weltanschauung as it does to poor teaching skills within the English classroom. The foundation of good writing is a hunger for knowledge and expansive, voracious, eclectic reading. We emulate that which we know and appreciate.

When our children were little, we would make at least three trips to the library per week, and bring back 20 books or so each time. My youngest boy was reading the KJV aloud to me at the age of 5, his mother having worked with him for a couple of weeks while I was abroad on a trip. When he was 17, he began working on a fantasy novel of his own, which for various reasons got set aside but click here for a sample )

Not bad for a 17-year-old. And the story was darn captivating, too - He put out the Prolog and Chapter 1, and I hung around with bated breath waiting for more to appear, because I wanted to see what happened.

The point of all this is that Mike was a voracious reader. He sought out Moby Dick by himself and enjoyed it, and Melville is not easy for many people far older than he. But you can't raise children on a diet of video games, using the TV as a babysitter, and expect them to put together a coherent sentence.

So while I understand your frustration and agree that there is much to be done, I posit that more needs to be done in homes long before the rug rats ever get inside a classroom. That's where the appreciation for the beauty of language begins. I for one am grateful that I can pick up a piece of writing by the likes of Eudora Welty or Walter van Tilburg Clark and be moved to tears as much by the beauty of the linguistic craftsmanship as by the tale itself...
theoldwolf: (Default)

Your result for Howard Gardner's Eight Types of Intelligence Test...

Naturalistic


"This area has to do with nature, nurturing and relating information to one's natural surroundings. Those with it are said to have greater sensitivity to nature and their place within it, the ability to nurture and grow things, and greater ease in caring for, taming and interacting with animals. They may also be able to discern changes in weather or similar fluctuations in their natural surroundings. They are also good at recognizing and classifying different species.


'Naturalists' learn best when the subject involves collecting and analyzing, or is closely related to something prominent in nature; they also don't enjoy learning unfamiliar or seemingly useless subjects with little or no connections to nature. It is advised that naturalistic learners would learn more through being outside or in a kinesthetic way.


Careers which suit those with this intelligence include scientists, naturalists, conservationists, gardeners and farmers." (Wikipedia)

Take Howard Gardner's Eight Types of Intelligence Test at HelloQuizzy



[Edit:] 37% Logical, 10% Spatial, 41% Linguistic, 14% Intrapersonal, 39% Interpersonal, 27% Musical, 12% Bodily-Kinesthetic and 61% Naturalistic

My linguistic skills were higher than all others except the Old Wolf stuff, so I'm comforted... a bit.

Profile

theoldwolf: (Default)
theoldwolf

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 3rd, 2025 09:37 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios