![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
theoldwolf) wrote2008-10-26 07:13 pm
Not what I expected!
Your result for Howard Gardner's Eight Types of Intelligence Test...
Naturalistic
"This area has to do with nature, nurturing and relating information to one's natural surroundings. Those with it are said to have greater sensitivity to nature and their place within it, the ability to nurture and grow things, and greater ease in caring for, taming and interacting with animals. They may also be able to discern changes in weather or similar fluctuations in their natural surroundings. They are also good at recognizing and classifying different species.
'Naturalists' learn best when the subject involves collecting and analyzing, or is closely related to something prominent in nature; they also don't enjoy learning unfamiliar or seemingly useless subjects with little or no connections to nature. It is advised that naturalistic learners would learn more through being outside or in a kinesthetic way.
Careers which suit those with this intelligence include scientists, naturalists, conservationists, gardeners and farmers." (Wikipedia)
Take Howard Gardner's Eight Types of Intelligence Test at HelloQuizzy
[Edit:] 37% Logical, 10% Spatial, 41% Linguistic, 14% Intrapersonal, 39% Interpersonal, 27% Musical, 12% Bodily-Kinesthetic and 61% Naturalistic
My linguistic skills were higher than all others except the Old Wolf stuff, so I'm comforted... a bit.
no subject
27% Logical, 33% Spatial, 51% Linguistic, 22% Intrapersonal, 16% Interpersonal, 51% Musical, 4% Bodily-Kinesthetic and 41% Naturalistic!
Though if the stupid picture was a large part of the Spatial intelligence, it's skewed--there's anecdotal evidence that astygmatisms (I have one in each eye) can keep 3D images from working "right". (I've never been able to make them work.)
no subject
no subject
no subject