Benevolent Dictatorship

[theoldwolf]

Caveat: Secular Humanists may want to skip this post.



Tonight's Schlock Mercenary brought me up short. One doesn't usually hear people extol the virtues of dictatorship in public, at least not if they're worried about their political future.

While the country could use people in office with the acumen and common sense that Howard Tayler displays, tragically he seems occupied with being a cartoonist and is thus subject to the scorn of nations on a regular basis. One more batch of scathing, vitriolic emails from disgruntled readers shouldn't make much difference.

Fortunately, to balance the equation, there are those whose understanding surpasses that of the unwashed masses:



But back to my thesis: It would be good to live under a just, enlightened and moral ruler who afforded his subjects their agency. This sounds only like a contradiction in terms because there have been so few examples of this kind of leadership in human history.

Monday's strip immediately put me in mind of the words of an ancient American prophet-king named Mosiah:

"Therefore, if it were possible that you could have just men to be your kings, who would establish the laws of God, and judge this people according to his commandments, yea, if ye could have men for your kings who would do even as my father Benjamin did for this people—I say unto you, if this could always be the case then it would be expedient that ye should always have kings to rule over you." (Book of Mormon, Mosiah 29:13)

In the secular environment, this model fails on all levels, because the concepts of justice and morality are relative, and impossible to pin down with any certainty. In the regular (i.e. the opposite of secular) environment, the most obvious parallel is the millennial rule of Christ as Theocrat/King. Outside of that, a just and moral dictator would have to be following an absolute standard of justice and morality, based on absolute fairness - which could only happen if the ruler were in regular contact with Divinity, hence, a prophet as well as a king. No ordinary mortal could pull it off.

From "Fiddler on the Roof"
What's wrong with being rich?
It's no reason to marry.
Money's the world's curse.
May the Lord smite me with it, and may I never recover!

I'm with that. May God smite the nations of the world with such rulers.

Comments

[deckardcanine.livejournal.com]

There are times I think we could use a monarch, but then I remember that the danger of tyranny isn't the only problem. One person cannot handle all the decisionmaking responsibilities of the United States; some would go ignored until another person claimed them. There's also the danger that one assassination or fatal accident would leave the nation paralyzed, effectively anarchic until a whole new regime arose. Large entities were not made for rapid changes.

I do believe that heaven has a hierarchy. Anything approaching democracy is a concession to Earth. C.S. Lewis opposed slavery not because no one deserved to be a slave, but because no one deserved to be a master. With an obvious exception.