theoldwolf: (Default)
[personal profile] theoldwolf
Tea Party activist is trying to get a ballot initiative on the books in California that will force schools to play Christmas music.

Under the "Freedom to Present Christmas Music in Public School Classrooms or Assemblies" initiative. The move would require schools to play traditional [read: religious] Christmas carols for students with the penalty for not doing so being legal action.

I adopted Mogg and came up with "hqiz" to help keep me from blaspheming, but this sort of social horsehockey brings me right up to the edge of the Cliffs of Insanity...

Holy [obscenity][vulgarity]. I don't care if the movement is taken seriously or not... the simple fact that anyone would have the solid osmium cojones to propose such a thing puts my brain into turks' head knots.

Gah!

Date: 2009-12-12 05:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] deckardcanine.livejournal.com
I suspect that this is deliberately extreme in an effort to counteract those who would prevent schools from being allowed to play Christmas music. But I don't like the method.

Date: 2009-12-12 06:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fearciuil.livejournal.com
The Supreme Court has already ruled that schools may use religious music, as long as they're not using it to proslethyze. I can't quote you the case (it's not Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1971), though that's one that is used in any such challenge; there is at least one case that's directly on point). Whatever it is is pretty much the salvation of school music programs, because without it, we wouldn't be able to teach a significant percentage of anything pre-Beethoven.

Date: 2009-12-12 10:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] r-caton.livejournal.com
And of course, whatever they play must be royalty free.....
since I've never known a teacher ever hold back from bootlegging.....

Date: 2009-12-12 10:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fearciuil.livejournal.com
I know plenty. Casting aspersions is the best you can offer?

Date: 2009-12-12 11:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ccdesan.livejournal.com
Things may be diff'rent over in the UK... I'm sure it wasn't meant as a slight.

Date: 2009-12-12 11:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] r-caton.livejournal.com
Yes. Sorry. I've been asked to provide material (fortunately most of my record collection went out of copyright years ago) and asked to copy copies, some of which were on tapes so cheap and nasty I wouldn't let them near a tape head. This was years ago, though, before the web covered the globe and before material could so easily be obtained though a computer. Seems like yesterday, though. These days the teachers I know are savvy enough to use YouTube and Google.
But you are right...
1. Teachers do a damn hard job unsupported for the most part by the politicals in charge. This leads (from what I've seen) to a somewhat pragmatic approach.
2. I could not do a teaching job. I just can't abide kids for long (but I've done film shows in the past and the old gig with the boots and beard)
3. The way I feel tonight doesn't incline me to great or scintillating wit or a charitable viewpoint.
4. It was a cheap shot anyway.
5. My apologies to you, teachers in general, and my friend the old wolf.

Are you of the teaching persuasion? If so what age range? if you don't take offence at my asking, that is....

Date: 2009-12-12 11:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fearciuil.livejournal.com
Yep, I'm a teacher; 5- through 11-year-olds.

Date: 2009-12-13 12:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] r-caton.livejournal.com
That's about the range of the schools I've had experience of ... with infants (5 - 8, roughly) separated from Juniors (9 - 10).

You wouldn't expect a 10 year old with 'tude to believe in the old guy with a beard but they do.... or want to so much they tell themselves they do.

You have my admiration, ... sir? I relate better to things, that's why I became an engineer. Albeit repair work is less and less feasible these days.

Date: 2009-12-13 12:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ccdesan.livejournal.com
She's a "ma'am". Image

[Stealth edit:] Not a "madam" Image
Edited Date: 2009-12-13 12:59 am (UTC)

Date: 2009-12-13 01:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] r-caton.livejournal.com
Oh *photons*

Sorry, dear lady. There are not enough men teaching in the younger age range as I am told... this leaves kids (who don't necessarily have a man at home) without male role models.
But I for one won't be rushing to even attempt to bridge that gap.

Date: 2009-12-13 09:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fearciuil.livejournal.com
No worries. If I minded, I would have made sure you knew.

Date: 2009-12-13 10:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ccdesan.livejournal.com
I'll vouch for that... Image

Profile

theoldwolf: (Default)
theoldwolf

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 8th, 2025 03:21 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios